Free Essays on Montags Transition

Montag’s Transition In our society people are often quick to judge and point out the faults of others, without clearly understanding the situations. The wrongs committed by people are often seen as grand and preposterous, yet they often fail to look within themselves and reflect on their own actions. Many times people fail to look at themselves through that mirror in which they dare to judge those different from them, which often deprives them of the truth. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradburry, Montag is firstly seen as a conformist who is influenced by what society infiltrates as being â€Å"proper†, yet later discovers his own identity and becomes aware of the wickedness of his own actions. Fahrenheit 451, takes place in a philistine society where censorship, and anti intellectualism are promoted. Due to the possibilities of differences, questions and problems that could arise about concepts of life and humanity, as well as issues of the people, this society conforms to what should be the â€Å"perfect† way of living. People are blindfolded into robot-beings, who dare not to use their minds to think about what they truly believe. Montag, one of the main characters, is a man who conforms to his surroundings and believes that his job as fireman (who burns books), is proper and good for the people. He, as many of the other citizens, was never exposed to anything else other than that isolated and oppressive world in which he lives in. Changes and differences seem harmful and troublesome, thus the human brains are not used or challenged at any instant. Yet, among of this brain-washed society, Montag is questioned by Clarisse, a seventeen year girl who is one of the few rebels, and humane people of this society. She is intact with the way society should be like, thus, Montag’s happiness is gambled with as she asks him questions which pertain to his own person and thoughts. As the novel progresses he begins to think... Free Essays on Montag's Transition Free Essays on Montag's Transition Montag’s Transition In our society people are often quick to judge and point out the faults of others, without clearly understanding the situations. The wrongs committed by people are often seen as grand and preposterous, yet they often fail to look within themselves and reflect on their own actions. Many times people fail to look at themselves through that mirror in which they dare to judge those different from them, which often deprives them of the truth. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradburry, Montag is firstly seen as a conformist who is influenced by what society infiltrates as being â€Å"proper†, yet later discovers his own identity and becomes aware of the wickedness of his own actions. Fahrenheit 451, takes place in a philistine society where censorship, and anti intellectualism are promoted. Due to the possibilities of differences, questions and problems that could arise about concepts of life and humanity, as well as issues of the people, this society conforms to what should be the â€Å"perfect† way of living. People are blindfolded into robot-beings, who dare not to use their minds to think about what they truly believe. Montag, one of the main characters, is a man who conforms to his surroundings and believes that his job as fireman (who burns books), is proper and good for the people. He, as many of the other citizens, was never exposed to anything else other than that isolated and oppressive world in which he lives in. Changes and differences seem harmful and troublesome, thus the human brains are not used or challenged at any instant. Yet, among of this brain-washed society, Montag is questioned by Clarisse, a seventeen year girl who is one of the few rebels, and humane people of this society. She is intact with the way society should be like, thus, Montag’s happiness is gambled with as she asks him questions which pertain to his own person and thoughts. As the novel progresses he begins to think...

50 Idioms About Fruits and Vegetables

50 Idioms About Fruits and Vegetables 50 Idioms About Fruits and Vegetables 50 Idioms About Fruits and Vegetables By Mark Nichol Food, one of the necessities of life, figures often in traditional expressions. Fruits and vegetables, specifically, account for some of the most familiar idioms, including the following. Fruit 1. To compare â€Å"apples and oranges† is to uselessly compare unlike things. 2. The â€Å"apple of (one’s) eye† is a favorite or well-like person. 3. To say that â€Å"the apple never falls far from the tree† is to suggest that a person’s personality traits are close to those of the person’s parents. 4. â€Å"As American as apple pie† means that something is quintessentially representative of American culture or values. 5. â€Å"(As) sure as God made little green apples† suggests certainty. 6–12. To be a â€Å"bad apple† or a â€Å"rotten apple† is to be a bad person. Meanwhile, to say that â€Å"one bad (or rotten) apple spoils the whole bunch (or barrel)† implies that one flawed element or person can undermine an effort or a group, and to be â€Å"rotten to the core† is to be thoroughly bad or worthless. 13–14. â€Å"How do you like them apples?† (or â€Å"How about them apples?†) is a neutral or taunting comment, depending on the context, that refers to an undesirable state or situation. 15–16. To â€Å"polish (one’s) apple† is to flatter someone; a flatterer is an â€Å"apple polisher.† 17. To â€Å"upset the apple cart† is to ruin plans. 18. A â€Å"banana republic† is a weak or corrupt country. 19–20. A â€Å"second banana† is a subordinate, and the â€Å"top banana† is the leader. 21–22. To â€Å"go bananas† is to become excited or crazed, and â€Å"to drive (someone) bananas† is to annoy or irritate someone. 23. Something in â€Å"cherry condition† is excellently maintained or restored. 24. To â€Å"cherry-pick† is to select carefully. 25. â€Å"Life is a bowl of cherries† means that life is easy. 26. To â€Å"not give a fig† is to be unconcerned. 27. A â€Å"lemon† is a flawed or worthless item; the idiom often refers to a vehicle. 28. â€Å"Melon† is sometimes used as slang for head or, vulgarly, for large breasts. 29. To say that someone or something is a â€Å"peach† means that they are beautiful, excellent, or sweet. 30. When everything is â€Å"peaches and cream,† life is going well. 31. A â€Å"plum† assignment or job is a highly coveted one. 32. One is said to have â€Å"sour grapes† when one belittles something one covets but cannot obtain. Vegetables 33–36. To be â€Å"full of beans† is to talk nonsense, and to â€Å"not know beans† is to be ignorant or uninformed. To be â€Å"not worth a hill of beans† is to be worthless, and to â€Å"spill the beans† is to tell a secret. 37–38. To â€Å"dangle a carrot† before someone is to encourage them with an incentive, and the carrot in â€Å"carrot and stick† is an incentive or reward. (The stick is the punishment.) 39. A â€Å"carrot top† is a red-haired person. 40. Someone â€Å"as cool as a cucumber† is very self-possessed under pressure. 41. To â€Å"pass an olive branch† is to make peaceful or reconciliatory overtures. 42. A â€Å"pea-brained† person is stupid. 43. Fog or something else very dense can be described as being â€Å"as thick as pea soup.† 44. To be â€Å"like two peas in a pod† is to be very close with or similar to someone. 45. To be â€Å"in a pickle† is to experience complication. 46. A â€Å"couch potato† is someone who spends an excessive amount of time seated watching television or playing video games. 47–48. A â€Å"hot potato† is a controversial or difficult issue, but to â€Å"drop (someone or something) like a hot potato† is to abandon the person or thing. 49. Something that is â€Å"small potatoes† is insignificant. 50. â€Å"Salad days† refers to the youthful period of one’s life. Fruits and vegetables figure occasionally in figurative references to color, such as â€Å"beet red† (the color of embarrassment), or descriptions of specific hues, like â€Å"cherry red,† as well as other comparisons, including â€Å"pear shaped.† The words fruit and vegetable themselves appear occasionally in idiomatic phrases, including the following: To â€Å"bear fruit† is to produce results. â€Å"Forbidden fruit† is something attractive but not allowed. The â€Å"fruits of one’s labors† are the results of the person’s efforts. To â€Å"become a vegetable† is to be rendered physically disabled or to virtually cease physical activity. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Rhetorical Devices for Rational WritingWriting the Century10 Functions of the Comma

MGT 501 Case assign Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

MGT 501 Case assign - Essay Example The case involves Linda Myers, an American national who takes a job as a human resource manager with SK Telcom, a multinational firm in South Korea. Myers had been involved in human resource development in the global set up, before her contract with SK, and perceived the SK opportunity as a career development opportunity that she had always desired. The environment at SK was however challenging because she was the only American among her peer and therefore had a different cultural approach. She was never oriented into the job or the organization’s culture and realized existence of conflicting opinion with her superiors regarding her work’s scope. Her two years with the organization was strenuous before she eventually left the company. She also noted that the organization had, through its recruiting agent, assumed her to be a male and even though she had experience in the global environment and had since her childhood been motivated by the international set up, she found it hard to adjust to the organization’s culture and expectations (Green, 2011). Problem definition The case identifies a problem of cultural barrier between Myers and the organization. Inability to break this barrier and establish a common ground upon which Myers could relate with other member of the organization was another problem as both Ms. Myers and the organization failed accommodate each other. ... s lack of significant involvement of American women in executive positions in South Korea identifies one of the manifestations of cultural differences that hindered her ability to integrate into the organization. The American women’s absence in the environment is indicative of the South Korean male chauvinistic perspective or a negative perspective towards American women and their ability to perform at executive positions. Myers’ perception of a different culture that she hoped to change in the organization also identifies cultural differences. She identified the organization’s culturally fixed perspective and wished to break this culture and expose the organization to a global culture that would be open to diversified opinions, but faced a high level of resistance. Even the scope of her job identified a conflict between her opinions and those of her immediate seniors. The organization’s poor management approach is another identifiable cause of the problem because it failed to orient Myers into its culture, a factor that facilitated impact of the differences between the two cultures (Green, 2011). Hofstede’s dimensions of culture also offer a basis for explaining cultural difference between American based culture that Myers represented and the Korean culture that SK Telcom and its management represented. Power distance is one of the cultural dimensions that explain the cause of the problem in the case. The dimension refers to society’s ability to accept inequality among its members. Those who are lowly place along the power ladders accept the status and do not fight for better positions and some of the dimension’s aspects are acknowledgement and appreciation of inequality, recognition of dependence on few leaders, privileges for the powerful member of the

Germana and Germania Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Germana and Germania - Essay Example When related to American values I believe that both nations value punctuality, perhaps more than other nations. A second stereotype of Germans that I hold to be true is that the nation and its inhabitants are highly efficient. For example there is a strong emphasis that trains, subways and busses are on time. The vehicles that are produced in Germany such as Porches, BMW’s, Mercedes’, and Audi’s are all considered to be fuel efficient yet perform extremely well. The manufactured products in Germany are often considered to be of the highest quality, for example the expression â€Å"Made in Germany† usually carries with it more prestige than products produced in developing nations. I believe that Americans value efficiency highly however it can be argued that there are a number of inefficiencies in American society. For example the rail network in America is costly. Many American cars are not fuel efficient yet I believe the expression â€Å"Made in the USA † still carries a lot of strength. A final stereotype of Germans that I highly value is that they are often considered very direct, or blunt in the way they speak. In business situations it may be best to simply receive somebody’s honest opinion (Even if the information is hard to accept).

Corporate Governance Evaluation and Rating Essay -- Business, Corporat

Corporate Governance Evaluation and Rating Nowadays it is not unusual for an investor to reflect governance matters while deciding about investment determinations. As a result, numerous corporations are in the business of rating corporate governance procedures of public companies. Some corporations offer credit ratings in addition to governance ratings. As far back as the 70’s organizations have dealt with business ethics in a host of different approaches which includes the institution of compliance platforms and supervisors, adding of ethics boards, initiating codes of conduct, preparing, and distribution of company mission and values. Because of scandals in the recent past, there is heightened emphasis for US corporations and government agency’s to offer more stringent structured governance and ethics platforms so that corporations are accountable to the communities in where they function (Barrett, Todd, Schlaudecker & Perrin, 2004). Corporate governance ratings corporations have started providing rating service as well. The clients for the service are diverse, and the audience is growing continually. Prospective clienteles of rating services comprise small investors, fund managers, institutional investors, accounting companies, executive search companies, recompense and governance consultant companies, and insurance companies. As a result of dubious conduct from personnel and as well as corporate executives has brought about vital queries about improving corporate ethics endeavors and addressing the fundamental reasons for these misconducts, in addition to the growing demand for preemptive social accountable, and supportable business procedures (Barrett, Todd, Schlaudecker & Perrin, 2004). Comprehending the circumstances sur... ...clusion It is still uncertain the importance of corporate governance ratings and how they will effect investors. Certainly, the usefulness of these types of ratings is deteriorated by the ostensible lack of uniformity amid rating agencies. To the degree ratings are comparative; they are likewise becoming unimportant since practices have largely improved with time. Numerous institutional investors have individual platforms for calculating governance and do not depend on outside services to measure those concerns. Some investors basically do not think those ratings are pertinent to investment determinations about the value of a corporation or their managers. However, issuers and investors might determine it more and more challenging to circumvent the consequences of governance ratings that might be observed as a proxy to a business’s respect for the shareholder.

Merchant of Venice (Anti- Semitism)

Questioning Humanity The Merchant Of Venice In the Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare, Shylock is portrayed as a manipulative, greedy, and money hungry man who, throughout the book, is consumed with the deterioration of his enemies. Because of the prevailing anti- Semitic sentiment in Shakespeare's time, you would naturally assume that the Merchant of Venice is an anti- Semitic play. However, as you continue to examine the text, Shakespeare portrays Shylock in a much more human way than was generally done in those days and he shows that Shylock is, in fact, a part of humanity.Shakespeare challenges anti-Semitism by showing that Jews are just like Christians. He does this by proving how the imperfections that people have are what make us human. Even today, Shakespeare shows the world how hypocritical people can be, no matter their religion, race, or personal beliefs. Shakespeare uses irony in this play to illustrate that the bad things that Shylock (the Jew) has done are no wor se than what Antonio (the Christian) has done in his lifetime.Therefore, this creates the effect of humanizing the characters and demonstrates that regardless of religion or race, people have both good and bad sides. Although Shylock’s Jewishness is made apparent from the very moment he is introduced, and thus seems to reinforce Shakespeare’s work as being anti-Semitic, it is in fact Shylock’s wit and humanity that reveal how Shakespeare challenges such bias. Before Shylock even enters the play, the scene introduction mentions that he is a Jew ­Ã‚ ­ and immediately sets your mind against him, especially in Elizabethan England when Jews were alienated.Shylock quoted, â€Å"[Antonio] hath disgraced me [Shylock] and hindered me half a million, laughed at my losses, mocked at my gains, scorned my nation, thwarted my bargains, cooled my friends, heated mine enemies—and what’s his reason? I [Shylock] am a Jew. (3:1:52). † While Jews were scorned because of their religious beliefs, Shakespeare made it clear that each religious group hated each other. For example, Shylock says, â€Å"I hate him for he is a Christian (1:3:40). † Therefore, although Shylock is made the â€Å"bad guy† in this play, he isn’t the only one guilty of religious discrimination.Shakespeare makes it clear that both Antonio and Shylock have no religious tolerance for each other and are prejudicial toward each other’s religion. Although William Shakespeare leads you to believe that Shylock is prejudiced toward Christians, the reason for his hatred becomes clear when you learn that he is a man who is abused by the Christians surrounding him. Shylock has a reason for his hatred, â€Å"You call me misbeliever, cut-throat dog, And spit upon my Jewish gaberdine. 1:3:121)† Shylock defends his hatred when he says, â€Å" Hath not a Jew Eyes? Hath not a Jew Hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer as a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that.If a Jew wrong a Christian, what is his humility? Revenge. If a Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why, revenge! (3:1: 52)† Therefore, it is Shylock’s human nature that leads him to despise Christians, not because of their religious beliefs directly, but because of their hatred of him simply because of his religious beliefs. Shylock defends his humanity by showing the Christians that they are no different from the Jews they treat with such disrespect.Shylock has a desire for revenge, which further humanizes him and connects him with Antonio. Because of Shakespeareâ€℠¢s choice of words, he leads you to believe that he is an anti-Semitic. However, a closer look at how Shakespeare shapes the play illustrates a deeper theme—that people are people, no matter their religion, race, or beliefs. Shylock doesn’t preform his actions because he is a Jew, he is simply mean because of the way the other characters treat him. Shylock says, â€Å"I have sworn an oath that I will have my bond.Thou call’dst me dog before thou hadst a cause, But since I am a dog, beware my fangs. † Shylock's actions are justified because of the way the other characters treat him. . Christian revenge is typical; therefore, Jewish revenge can’t be faulted. While Shylock is mean because of the cruel treatment he has received throughout his life, Antonio has no excuse. Shylock makes you realize that while Shakespeare may give the appearance that he is an anti-Semitist, he really believes that all people are equal and hatred is universal.At the end of the day, Shakespeare proves that it is Shylock’s humanity that makes him just like everyone else. He shows that the conflicts in The Merchant of Venice may start out because of religious differences; however, the actual message is more how the desire for revenge is something all people have in common, despite any other differences in their lives. Shylock challenges the stereotypes given to him in the beginning of the book and creates a complex character whose behavior is justified because of the way the other characters treat him.The Merchant of Venice demonstrates that no writers have to be bound by the prejudices of their time. While Shakespeare probably never met a Jew in his lifetime, he showed that religion doesn’t define who a person is. Some people may argue that because Shakespeare gives Shylock the stereotypical Jewish characteristics, he is obviously anti-Semitic. However, Shakespeare proves through Shylock that his intention wasn’t to emphasize anti- Semitism, but to show that all people have both good and bad sides to them.

SUNY Cortland Admissions SAT Scores, Financial Aid...